|
|
|
|
|
Africans
Whom Westerners Should Heed
(Editor’s Note: A slightly revised version of
this essay by Mackinac Center President Lawrence W. Reed appears in the
December 2005 issue of "The Freeman," the journal of the Foundation
for Economic Education — www.fee.org.) At the G-8 Summit in Scotland this past July,
European and North American politicians (all of them white) cried crocodile
tears for the plight of black Africans. Echoing a gaggle of actors, rock
stars, socialist ideologues, Third World dictators and other learned economic
development experts, they called for another transfer of wealth from
developed nations to the undeveloped ones of Africa — which, by most
measures, would seem to exclude no country on the continent. G-8 leaders want governments to dramatically
boost the overall level of foreign aid to Africa and grant relief for debts
incurred in the past by African regimes. The magnitude of the proposed
subsidies brings new meaning to the usually pejorative phrase, "throw
money at the problem." Bold, imaginative leadership? New, creative
solutions to intractable problems? Hardly. More like political posturing,
expensive guilt trips, and ignorance of reality and economics. The collective
response of thinking people should be, "Been there, done that." Indeed, that is the response of a growing
number of thinking people in Africa itself. Not the governments of Africa, of
course, whose fingers foreign aid must often slip through first before
trickling into the mouths of the hungry citizens they oppress. Not the rich,
transient showmen like Bono who think they’ve "experienced Africa"
by venturing out of a 5-star hotel with a digital camera. I’m referring to
native Africans who have seen firsthand what foreign aid has done to their
countries, who understand what really makes an undeveloped country become
developed, and who are writing and speaking out with a boldness and erudition
that is challenging the failed status quo. One such man is former grade school teacher James Shikwati
of Kenya. Thirty-four-year-old Shikwati made
waves in both Europe and Africa in a July
interview published by Germany’s Der Speigel. "For God’s Sake, Please Stop the
Aid!" screamed the headline. Shikwati argued
that billions in past aid have simply fattened bureaucracies, bred corruption
and fostered complacency at best. At worst, aid has weakened local farmers
and entrepreneurs who can’t compete with free foreign stuff. "If the
industrial nations really want to help the Africans," he declared,
"they should finally terminate this awful aid." Shikwati’s think tank, the Inter-Region
Economic Network, fosters free market economic education. It hosts
seminars in east Africa focused on training Africans to develop their own
entrepreneurial talents and oppose government policies that stand in their
way. He believes that development cannot happen as long as large numbers of Africans,
encouraged by Western statists, think of themselves
as victims and beggars. Instead of acting like "a child that cries for
its babysitter," he says Africa "should stand on its own two
feet." Leon Louw of South
Africa was all but alone when he said similar things in the 1970s. In this
year, the 30th anniversary of his Free Market Foundation in
Johannesburg and Cape Town, he can celebrate the fact that groups like his
and Shikwati’s are on the rise in Africa — and
striking a chord with ordinary Africans as they put the policies of
governments at home and abroad under the microscope. The policy
"debate" is no longer a litany of socialist and welfarist
prescriptions but is enlivened now by a healthy case for the rule of law and
free enterprise. In Africa’s most populous nation, Nigeria,
criticism of Western aid is echoed by former journalist Thompson Ayodele.
As founder and head of the Institute of
Public Policy Analysis, Ayodele observes that
"From 1970 to 2000 Africa received about $400 billion in aid. Africa has
got enough financial help from overseas…. If anyone really wants to help poor
Africans out of the vicious circle of poverty he must promote free commerce,
protect property rights, encourage openness to trade, allow markets to
flourish and reduce government intervention in the economy." Ayodele doesn’t want British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s money,
but he does want a policy change. "Prime Minister Blair should use the
same zeal and commitment which he now devotes to promoting foreign aid and
debt cancellation to call instead for the phasing-out of trade-distorting
subsidies and tariffs among his allies which total $1 billion a day.
Abrogating those policies would do far more to improve the lives of millions
of poverty-stricken people in Africa than any amount of foreign aid." Harmful as they are, trade barriers imposed by
non-African countries aren’t nearly as bad as the barriers African
governments foist on fellow Africans. Average tariffs within Africa, notes
the International Monetary Fund, are more than 50 percent higher than in the
rest of the world. Figures from the World Bank indicate that while sub-Saharan
African nations hit agricultural commodities from Europe with an average
tariff of 19 percent, they burden similar products from their neighbors with
a staggering 33.6 percent rate. Moreover, goods sit stranded by red tape at
customs in sub-Saharan countries for an average of three times longer than
they do in Western Europe. For decades, Kenyans could buy Ugandan
foodstuffs from Britain for less than they could buy them from Uganda. Free
traders like Shikwati have imagined how much better
off Kenyans would be if they could avoid their own tariffs and the British
middleman by buying directly from nearby Uganda. Finally, in January 2005,
free trade scored a victory when several east African countries signed a
joint customs union protocol that reduced or eliminated many tariffs. Liberalizing trade within Africa is a recurring
theme of the work of one of the continent’s newest think tanks. Known as Imani: the Centre
for Humane Education, its founder, Franklin Cudjoe,
believes that "a huge deficit of market-oriented policies is the main
factor holding Africa back." He notes that trade restrictions underwrite
the massive inefficiencies of state-protected industries at the expense of
consumers. His organization is educating young scholars in his native Ghana
to promote the needed changes. Cudjoe speaks in brutally honest terms about the high-level
corruption that steals savings from citizens and capital from entrepreneurs.
Government spending throughout Africa, he says, routinely funnels both aid
and tax dollars to the politically well-connected. When foreign aid advocates
claim that a child dies in Africa every three seconds from hunger or disease,
Cudjoe poignantly asks "But do you realize
that $4,700 gets stolen by African governments every second?" When the Dutch-based airline KLM offered to
begin flights from Ghana to neighboring countries, Ghanaian government
officials demanded bribes. KLM pulled out. "Western nations didn’t do
that to us, and Western aid only helps keep such a system going," says Cudjoe. It’s even harder to see how Westerners can be
blamed for troubles in Zimbabwe when its leader, Robert Mugabe,
lives like a prince as his Marxist policies squander the nation’s dwindling
wealth. This past summer alone, Mugabe’s goons
forcibly displaced three-quarters of a million people in a campaign against
private enterprise and his political opponents. Hundreds of thousands are
shivering in tents and hovels, their homes and businesses razed. Does anyone
besides Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton think that
what Zimbabwe really needs is a boatload of Western cash? Market advocates throughout Africa have come to
a conclusion once famously expressed by the comic strip character Pogo:
"We have met the enemy and he is us." They understand that foreign
subsidies may salve the consciences of naïve foreigners, but they perpetuate
the poverty-creating cultural and political pathologies that Africans must
shed. They have stepped forward and devoted their careers to filling a longstanding
void in discussions about Africa. If there is reason for hope in Africa, it is not
because Westerners may foolishly throw more good money after bad. It is
because native Africans like Shikwati, Louw, Ayodele and Cudjoe are plainly telling the world about the painful
lessons we all must learn from past policies. ##### Lawrence W. Reed is president of the Mackinac
Center for Public Policy, a research and educational institute headquartered
in Midland, Mich. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby
granted, provided that the author and the Center are properly cited. |